Planning and Public Space

Urban Planning Basics for Older Waterfront Cities

A plain overview of what planners do, the main tools they use, and why older waterfront cities such as Camden face particular planning questions.

On this page
  1. What planners do
  2. Why older waterfront cities are a special case
  3. The main planning tools
  4. How a typical planning process runs
  5. Several governments, not one
  6. Limits of planning
  7. Reading local planning news

What planners do

City planners help a community decide how land, buildings, streets and public places should be used and how they should change over time. The work is part research, part design, part public process and part administration. A planner might analyze population trends, review a developer’s application, draft a policy, run a public meeting or help prepare a grant application.

Planners rarely make final decisions themselves. In New Jersey, as in most places, decisions are made by appointed boards and elected officials, with planners advising and preparing the material those bodies consider. Planning is best understood as a way of organizing information and choices so that decisions are made openly and with some thought for the long term.

Why older waterfront cities are a special case

Cities built along rivers and harbors often share a set of conditions. Their waterfronts were first working edges, lined with docks, rail spurs, warehouses and factories. When shipping and manufacturing changed, much of that land became underused. Camden, on the Delaware River, is one of many cities in the Northeast with this kind of history, which is covered in more detail in the pieces on industrial Camden and port facilities.

Several planning questions follow from that past:

  • What should happen to large former industrial parcels, some of which may carry soil or groundwater contamination?
  • How can the public get access to a shoreline that was long closed off by industry, rail lines and highways?
  • How should a low-lying area prepare for tides and storms, given that the tidal floodplain covers parts of many river cities?
  • How can new investment be encouraged without pushing out the people already living nearby?

None of these questions has a single correct answer, and reasonable people disagree about the trade-offs.

The main planning tools

Planners work with a fairly small set of tools, each with a different purpose.

Long-range plans. A comprehensive or master plan sets out a community’s goals and describes, in general terms, how land might be used. These documents guide later decisions but are usually not binding on their own. How cities use them, and where their limits lie, is a topic in itself, covered in the discussion of master plans.

Zoning and land-use regulation. Zoning divides a municipality into districts and sets rules for what may be built where. It is the tool that most directly shapes individual properties. The basics are explained in the guide to zoning rules.

Capital planning. A city’s capital budget lists major physical projects such as street reconstruction, park improvements and utility work. A plan that is not connected to funding often stays on paper, so many planners pay close attention to how projects are paid for. The wider context appears in the explanation of municipal budgets.

Redevelopment and land assembly tools. New Jersey has specific laws that allow municipalities to designate areas in need of redevelopment, adopt redevelopment plans and work with designated developers. These tools are often used on former industrial or underused land. The details are technical and have been debated, so readers should consult official sources for how they apply in a particular case.

Design standards and guidelines. These address how streets, buildings and open spaces look and function, including sidewalks, building placement and landscaping.

Environmental and historic review. Projects may need to consider contamination, flooding, wetlands or historic buildings, depending on location and funding sources.

How a typical planning process runs

Although every community differs, many planning efforts follow a similar sequence:

  1. Gather information about existing conditions, such as land use, population, traffic, environmental constraints and market trends.
  2. Hear from residents, businesses and institutions about their priorities and concerns.
  3. Develop alternatives and weigh their costs, benefits and effects on different groups.
  4. Adopt a plan or policy through a public body, often after a hearing.
  5. Carry it out through regulations, budgets, projects and partnerships.
  6. Review the results and revise the approach.

Step two is where residents have the most direct role, and the quality of that step often shapes whether a plan is trusted. Ways to take part are described in the article on community participation.

Several governments, not one

Planning in a city like Camden does not happen in isolation. The municipality controls local zoning and many local projects. The county, the state and federal agencies also play roles, particularly for roads, bridges, transit, environmental cleanup and funding. Regional bodies coordinate transportation and other issues across municipal boundaries. A single waterfront project may therefore involve several levels of government, which helps explain why large projects often take many years.

Understanding who is responsible for what is useful for anyone following a local issue. The roles of city government and county government differ, and a question about a state highway, for example, usually belongs to a different agency than a question about a neighborhood street.

Limits of planning

Planning has real limits. Plans express intentions, but outcomes depend on money, markets, politics, legal constraints and events no one predicted. A zoning change can allow a type of development without causing it to happen. Public investment can improve conditions yet still produce uneven benefits among neighborhoods.

Planning also carries a history that deserves honesty. In the middle of the twentieth century, many American cities used planning tools, including highway construction, urban renewal and housing policy, in ways that displaced residents and divided neighborhoods. That history is part of why modern planners place more emphasis on participation and on examining who benefits and who bears costs.

Reading local planning news

For readers who want to follow planning in their own area, a few habits help. Look for the original document rather than a summary. Check the date, since plans are revised and sometimes replaced. Notice whether a proposal is a vision, a regulation or a funded project, because these carry very different weight. Public agendas and minutes usually show what is actually scheduled for decision.

The specific rules, boards and procedures in any city change over time, so current information should always be confirmed with the municipality or the relevant agency. This article is a general explanation and not legal or professional advice.

Keep exploring

Guides from other topics

All topics →